This page tells you how many women and girls there were for every thousand men and boys in each village around Dholera in 2011. It matters because the sex ratio is one of the oldest and bluntest measures of how a place treats its daughters, and it is published for every village in India.
The short version
Only Chharodiya recorded more females than males, at 1,023.55 per thousand. Ratanpur and Jaska come next, both just under parity. The lowest in the set is 820 females per thousand males. Sixty six of the 72 villages recorded fewer women than men.
What this ranking is
This is the last time anybody counted these villages one by one and published the answer. The Census of India sent enumerators to every village in the country in 2011 and asked the same questions everywhere, which is what makes the answers comparable. The amenity questions were asked in 2009. That is old, and we say so on every figure, but it is the only complete, uniform and free record of what was on the ground before the industrial city arrived. If you want to understand what Dholera SIR was built on top of, this is the baseline.
None of this describes 2026. Roads have been built, land has changed hands and the expressway has opened since the surveyors came. Read it as the starting line, not the current score.
Which villages are in it. The 69 villages of Dhandhuka taluka, sub-district code 03787, plus the three Barwala taluka villages that appear on the Dholera development authority's own 22 village boundary map. Seventy two villages in all. Census 2011 has no Dholera taluka because Dholera taluka was only created in 2015, so the villages sit under the taluka names the Census used at the time.
What the numbers say
This is not a property metric and we are not pretending it is one. It is published, it is official, it separates these villages meaningfully, and it says something true about the place that no brochure will. One village in seventy two had more women than men.
The highest figure is 1,023.60 females per 1,000 males and the lowest is 820 females per 1,000 males. The middle village of the ranking sits at 923.30 females per 1,000 males.
The full ranking, all 72 villages
| # | Village | Females per 1,000 males | Males (2011) | Females (2011) | Boundary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chharodiya | 1,023.6 | 467 | 478 | Outside |
| 2 | Ratanpur | 994.8 | 193 | 192 | Outside |
| 3 | Jaska | 991.6 | 475 | 471 | Outside |
| 4 | Buranpur | 990.0 | 401 | 397 | Outside |
| 5 | Chandarva | 984.3 | 1,463 | 1,440 | Outside |
| 6 | Fattepur | 979.5 | 488 | 478 | Outside |
| 7 | Jaliya | 978.1 | 912 | 892 | Outside |
| 8 | Kamiyala | 974.8 | 477 | 465 | Outside |
| 9 | Pipli | 970.5 | 780 | 757 | Outside |
| 10 | Pipal | 964.3 | 308 | 297 | Outside |
| 11 | Mingalpur | 962.9 | 1,266 | 1,219 | In the SIR |
| 12 | Kasindra | 962.2 | 609 | 586 | Outside |
| 13 | Zanzarka | 959.5 | 914 | 877 | Outside |
| 14 | Mota Tradiya | 959.0 | 1,122 | 1,076 | Outside |
| 15 | Dholera | 957.0 | 1,420 | 1,359 | In the SIR |
| 16 | Navagam | 956.7 | 323 | 309 | Outside |
| 17 | Tagadi | 955.1 | 1,203 | 1,149 | Outside |
| 18 | Kadipur | 954.2 | 284 | 271 | In the SIR |
| 19 | Valinda | 949.2 | 669 | 635 | Outside |
| 20 | Bhalgamda | 947.2 | 379 | 359 | Outside |
| 21 | Umargadh | 945.3 | 439 | 415 | Outside |
| 22 | Haripura | 944.8 | 344 | 325 | Outside |
| 23 | Aniyali Bhimji | 944.2 | 627 | 592 | Outside |
| 24 | Khadol | 940.4 | 872 | 820 | Outside |
| 25 | Bajarda | 940.3 | 2,313 | 2,175 | Outside |
| 26 | Hebatpur | 939.1 | 3,269 | 3,070 | In the SIR |
| 27 | Sandhida | 939.0 | 508 | 477 | In the SIR |
| 28 | Parabdi | 936.5 | 299 | 280 | Outside |
| 29 | Rojka | 932.9 | 1,685 | 1,572 | Outside |
| 30 | Panchi | 930.6 | 620 | 577 | In the SIR |
| 31 | Gunjar | 930.3 | 1,148 | 1,068 | Outside |
| 32 | Anandpur | 927.1 | 343 | 318 | Outside |
| 33 | Kotda | 927.0 | 1,547 | 1,434 | Outside |
| 34 | Nana Tradiya | 925.8 | 566 | 524 | Outside |
| 35 | Vasana | 925.5 | 1,182 | 1,094 | Outside |
| 36 | Sodhi | 924.0 | 1,749 | 1,616 | In the SIR |
| 37 | Gorasu | 922.6 | 930 | 858 | In the SIR |
| 38 | Bhadiyad | 921.1 | 988 | 910 | In the SIR |
| 39 | Galsana | 919.5 | 1,714 | 1,576 | Outside |
| 40 | Vagad | 919.2 | 1,126 | 1,035 | Outside |
| 41 | Chhasiyana | 917.3 | 1,463 | 1,342 | Outside |
| 42 | Zinzar | 913.7 | 649 | 593 | Outside |
| 43 | Mundi | 912.3 | 593 | 541 | In the SIR |
| 44 | Zankhi | 912.0 | 443 | 404 | In the SIR |
| 45 | Fedra | 909.9 | 1,543 | 1,404 | Outside |
| 46 | Padana | 907.0 | 1,709 | 1,550 | Outside |
| 47 | Gamph | 899.8 | 1,347 | 1,212 | Outside |
| 48 | Unchdi | 896.9 | 989 | 887 | Outside |
| 49 | Pachchham | 896.9 | 1,290 | 1,157 | Outside |
| 50 | Sangasar | 895.4 | 583 | 522 | In the SIR |
| 51 | Kharad | 892.8 | 737 | 658 | Outside |
| 52 | Shela | 891.4 | 801 | 714 | Outside |
| 53 | Adval | 890.0 | 1,828 | 1,627 | Outside |
| 54 | Morasiya | 888.9 | 342 | 304 | Outside |
| 55 | Akru | 888.9 | 1,593 | 1,416 | Outside |
| 56 | Dhanala | 888.1 | 438 | 389 | Outside |
| 57 | Salasar | 887.8 | 303 | 269 | Outside |
| 58 | Khun | 885.7 | 665 | 589 | In the SIR |
| 59 | Ambli | 879.4 | 1,169 | 1,028 | In the SIR |
| 60 | Otariya | 878.0 | 861 | 756 | In the SIR |
| 61 | Khasta | 877.9 | 688 | 604 | Outside |
| 62 | Bhimtalav | 876.9 | 65 | 57 | In the SIR |
| 63 | Kothadiya | 873.7 | 499 | 436 | Outside |
| 64 | Bhangadh | 868.5 | 1,247 | 1,083 | In the SIR |
| 65 | Mahadevpura | 866.3 | 688 | 596 | In the SIR |
| 66 | Bavliyari | 863.8 | 1,615 | 1,395 | In the SIR |
| 67 | Rayka | 860.2 | 901 | 775 | Outside |
| 68 | Rahtalav | 860.0 | 707 | 608 | In the SIR |
| 69 | Cher | 859.0 | 156 | 134 | In the SIR |
| 70 | Kamatalav | 852.2 | 846 | 721 | Outside |
| 71 | Sarwal | 821.1 | 654 | 537 | Outside |
| 72 | Gogla | 820.0 | 550 | 451 | In the SIR |
Census of India 2011, village directory. The amenity questions were surveyed in 2009. These are not current conditions and this site never presents them as current conditions.
Derived figure. Female population divided by male population, multiplied by one thousand, with both published inputs shown.
How to use this without being misled
If you are moving a family here rather than buying land to hold, this is the sort of figure worth knowing about the village you would actually live in. It is a 2011 figure and the industrial city has since brought in a construction workforce that is overwhelmingly male, so the current ratio in the working villages is very likely lower, not higher. We have no source for the current figure and do not guess at one.
Sources
- Census of India 2011, Village Directory for Ahmadabad district, Gujarat, published by the Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India. censusindia.gov.in catalogue 405. Local extract: 72 village records, 396 columns, taken 4 August 2026. Status: OFFICIAL.
Every figure on this page was computed at build time from the extract named above, not typed in by hand. Where the source records nothing, the cell reads UNKNOWN rather than a guess. We do not sell land and nobody can pay to change a position in any list here.
Last verified: 11 August 2026Before you pay anyone
Whatever you read here, the last step is always the same. Look the project up on the state regulator's website yourself, read the land record, and get the full price in writing. Our checklist walks through it in the order that saves you the most time.
Open the checklist